Welcome to the Intranet Maturity Framework⢠wiki. This is a working document and a wiki, which means that "anyone with access to an Internet-connected computer can edit, correct, or improve information throughout simply by clicking the edit page" link (from Wikipedia). An overview of the framework, as well as a help page is available.
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
Comments (6)
anu said
at 1:28 pm on Aug 2, 2006
Might want to think about adding a Creative Commons license to make explicit the terms of reuse ?
razorfish said
at 4:13 pm on Aug 2, 2006
The framework itself is marked "TM" since it was developed through proprietary research. The evolving nature of the wiki, however, is similar to wikipedia (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights).
anu said
at 9:25 am on Aug 4, 2006
So you're saying that as long as the trademarked term "Intranet Maturity Framework" is not used, the content itself is GPL'd / copylefted ?
razorfish said
at 3:52 pm on Aug 7, 2006
The content was originally copyrighted and published in its print version. The wiki version allows the content to develop organically. This means editing, citing, referencing would be fair use (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fair_use). Meanwhile your thoughts about Creative Commons are good and is considered with your last question about copyleft. Shiv will deal more specifically with explicitness in terms of reuse.
anu said
at 8:37 am on Aug 9, 2006
Sure I understand - but there may come a time when the contents of certain sections will be completely different from what was originally copyrighted, and as such are probably new works (or maybe derivative). The point being that I wonder how interesting it is for people to participate if they don't obtain certain rights, or rights implicitly revert to Razorfish. F
A CC attribution license might work quite well in permanently identifying Razorfish as the original creators of the work while still allowing others to reuse the content as they see fit...
Anonymous said
at 1:57 am on Mar 31, 2007
You've been hacked
M!Cr0_3L1T3
You don't have permission to comment on this page.
Comments (6)
anu said
at 1:28 pm on Aug 2, 2006
Might want to think about adding a Creative Commons license to make explicit the terms of reuse ?
razorfish said
at 4:13 pm on Aug 2, 2006
The framework itself is marked "TM" since it was developed through proprietary research. The evolving nature of the wiki, however, is similar to wikipedia (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights).
anu said
at 9:25 am on Aug 4, 2006
So you're saying that as long as the trademarked term "Intranet Maturity Framework" is not used, the content itself is GPL'd / copylefted ?
razorfish said
at 3:52 pm on Aug 7, 2006
The content was originally copyrighted and published in its print version. The wiki version allows the content to develop organically. This means editing, citing, referencing would be fair use (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fair_use). Meanwhile your thoughts about Creative Commons are good and is considered with your last question about copyleft. Shiv will deal more specifically with explicitness in terms of reuse.
anu said
at 8:37 am on Aug 9, 2006
Sure I understand - but there may come a time when the contents of certain sections will be completely different from what was originally copyrighted, and as such are probably new works (or maybe derivative). The point being that I wonder how interesting it is for people to participate if they don't obtain certain rights, or rights implicitly revert to Razorfish. F
A CC attribution license might work quite well in permanently identifying Razorfish as the original creators of the work while still allowing others to reuse the content as they see fit...
Anonymous said
at 1:57 am on Mar 31, 2007
You've been hacked
M!Cr0_3L1T3
You don't have permission to comment on this page.